Enlightened Male2000

August 13, 2010

Does Circumcision Make It Safer

Filed under: Culture, Discussion, The Male Form — Tags: , , — martin @ 4:20 am

In male human anatomy, the foreskin (1) is a generally retractable double-layered fold of skin and mucous membrane that covers the glans penis (3) and protects the urinary meatus (2) when the penis is not erect.

The outside of the foreskin is a continuation of the skin on the shaft of the penis, but the inner foreskin is a mucous membrane (5) like the inside of the eyelid or the mouth. The mucocutaneous zone occurs where the outer and inner foreskin meet. Like the eyelid, the foreskin is free to move after it separates from the glans, usually by puberty. Smooth muscle fibers keep it close to the glans but make it highly elastic.  The foreskin is attached to the glans with a frenulum (4), which helps return the foreskin over the glans. At the end of the foreskin, there is a band of tissue called the ridged band, (6) which, according to some researchers, contains nerve endings called Meissner’s corpuscles. According to a study by Sorrells et al. (2007), the five most sensitive areas of the penis are on the foreskin.

Like the penis itself, foreskins come in all shapes and sizes.

.

Some doctors and researchers believe there are medical and practical reasons to circumcise men.

From MedicalDude.com

Gay Men Undergoing Circumcision Would Have Limited

Impact On Preventing HIV

Adult circumcision has been proposed as a possible HIV prevention strategy for gay men, but a new study by the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health presented at the XVIII International AIDS Conference suggests it would have a very small effect on reducing HIV incidence in the United States.

Circumcision is thought to reduce the risk of HIV transmission by removing cells in the foreskin that are most susceptible to infection by the virus. Clinical trials conducted in Africa have found it reduces the risk of HIV in heterosexual men, yet there is little evidence that it can reduce transmission among American gay men.

The study was based on surveys of 521 gay and bisexual men in San Francisco. Findings indicated that 115 men (21 percent) were HIV-positive and 327 (63 percent) had been circumcised. Of the remaining 69 men (13 percent), only three (0.5 percent) said they would be willing to participate in a clinical trial of circumcision and HIV prevention, and only four (0.7 percent) were willing to get circumcised if it was proven safe and effective in preventing HIV.

(more…)

May 11, 2009

Circumcision

Filed under: Culture, Discussion — Tags: , , — martin @ 6:30 pm

Given the choice, I would not have parted with my foreskin.

But what can you say?  You’re one day old.  Your parents were doing what they thought was best, whatever their reason.  So, from time to time, for the rest of your life,  you wonder what it would feel like to be complete, to be whole.  You wonder what it would have looked like; long, completely covering the glans, drooping off the end with a stretchy nipple of skin; or short and snug, leaving a peek at your pee hole.  You wonder how having your foreskin might have affected your life.

It’s an ancient ritual suffered by approximately one third of the male population, mostly Muslims and Jews and Protestant American guys, rooted in religious or cultural convictions and rites of passage into manhood.  Plus that boy will look like dad.  A logical question – why is it still going on today?

800px-circumcision_central_asia2

Other than religion, the two main arguments in favor of circumcision (both  controversial)  appear to be hygiene and disease prevention:  it can get ugly and smelly under there (unless, of course, you wash it!);  you can be infected or pass along STDs (unless, of course, you wear a condom for casual sex!).  And believe it or not, circumcision has also been used to prevent masturbation.

In 1933 the estimated number of “victims” in the US was 32%.  The number rose to 70% by 1945; 85% by 1965; and peaked in the 1970s at 91%.  Then we finally started thinking about it.  The rate was 56% in 2005.  Today it’s less than 1% in England.

Somehow many Americans thinks the penis looks better cut.

flaccid-erect

As opposed to uncut.

flaccid-erect1

Ask an Englishman … that’s cultural.  We’ve been conditioned.

In America the severed foreskin might be used for research in the skin-care industry; in some parts of Africa it might be eaten; Jewish law states that it should be buried.  Why don’t we just leave the newborn males alone, let the guy make the decision when he’s older and screws up the courage to go through with it, if that’s what he wants?  At least it will be his choice.

Many men are involved in foreskin restoration.  For the best information I’ve found on this, check out NORM (The National Organization of Restoring Men).

What about you?  Are you circumcised?  Would you rather not be, or are you glad you are?  If you’re not cut, have you had any associated problems, cultural or physical?  Should we stop circumcising male infants and let them decide when they get older.  If you’re female, what do you think?  Does it make any difference to you if your husband or boyfriend has been circumcised?

Powered by WordPress