Enlightened Male2000

August 1, 2009

Spartacus, A New Series on Starz

Filed under: Movies & Theater — Tags: , — martin @ 6:42 pm

spartacus1

Damn!!!

If these eyes don’t open a man’s imagination to flights of fantasy, I doubt anything will.

Anyway, if you like looking at naked men in action scenes, this looks like a good place to be come January 2010.  You’ll also have to be prepared for a lot of gore and violence.  What doesn’t seem clear just yet, is whether or not  a quality storyline will accompany these tantalizing scenes.  Reviews from TV.COM and HITFIX.COM follow below.

From: TV.com

By Anna Hiatt

The gladiator Spartacus is coming to TV with a star-studded cast and a graphic style that makes 300 seem tame.

I am Spartacus!!

Raunchy sex and bloody violence reign in Spartacus: Blood and Sand, a new TV spectacle about a Thracian soldier-turned-gladiator. We got an exclusive look at the extended trailer for the new show, which is coming to Starz in January 2010. Trust us when we say: Spartacus is racier, more fast-paced, and more violent than any other show on TV.

How so? The sex scenes (complete with nudity) are so explicit everyone short of sex workers will blush. Every detail of the brutal gladiatorial massacres in Roman arenas is included — arching blood squirts, sliced tendons, the works. Seriously, it’s like 300 on steroids. On TV. Titillating, no?

Spartacus has the sensory impact of a sledgehammer — in a good way. For visual punch, the show is mostly produced using a green screen (meaning most of the backgrounds are computer-generated), with meticulous attention paid to visual storytelling. The result? A show that’s so realistic you’ll feel like one of the thousands of jeering Romans watching as those poor suckers get skewered in the arena. It’s hard not to enjoy.

In addition to sex and violence, Spartacus also has an impressive cast, including the Warrior Princess Lucy Lawless as the scheming wife of Batiatus (John Hannah), owner of a gladiator school. Andy Whitfield plays Spartacus.

Spartacus has all the makings of an instant hit: violent slaughters that may be too hard for some to stomach, spectacular production value, and, of course, Lucy Lawless.

(more…)

June 13, 2009

The Powerful Art of Thomas Eakins

Filed under: Art, Body Acceptance — Tags: , , — martin @ 8:34 am
Thomas Eakins

Thomas Eakins

By age twelve, growing up in Philadelphia, Eakins was already displaying his talent for art.  After studying art in Pennsylvania and Paris, finding himself more interested in human anatomy than the Impressionist movement, he went on to develop his anatomically precise style.

thomaseakins3

A letter to his father in 1868 made his fascination with the human body clear:  She [the female nude] is the most beautiful thing there is in the world except a naked man, but I never yet saw a study of one exhibited … It would be a godsend to see a fine man model painted in the studio with the bare walls, alongside of the smiling smirking goddesses of waxy complexion amidst the delicious arsenic green trees and gentle wax flowers & purling streams running melodious up & down the hills especially up. I hate affectation.

thomas-eakins-taking-the-count

How one can look at art such as Eakins and still find the human body shameful or anything other than nature’s finest work, is beyond me.

thomaseakins2

Eakins is credited with bringing photography in to the world of art.  With these college students, he captures the beauty of the male form, human energy, and male camaraderie.

thomaseakins_swimminghole

The Swimming Hole (1884-5) (above), is considered his finest study of the nude.  The figures involved were his students and friends.

thomaseakins4_arcadia1

Makes you wonder why anyone would want to wear clothes.

eakins_salutat

thomas_eakins_nude_models_61

A photograph of Thomas Eakins (left) and a friend.

Below, Thomas Eakins carrying a woman.

eakins_carrying_a_woman

May 15, 2009

America’s Trouble with Body Acceptance

Filed under: Body Acceptance, Culture, Discussion — Tags: , , — martin @ 7:21 pm

Article by: MARC PASCAL, The Moderate Voice

Perhaps living and studying in Europe on a number of occasions changed my perspective, but I cannot understand the silly outrage that many Americans show when some female displays her nipples, or other parts of her anatomy that are supposed to be off-limits.  Contrarily the displays of male genitalia and buttocks are more often treated as comic relief.  Public or private nudity does not pose a threat to American values and morality.

Too many Americans have an unhealthy and uncomfortable attitude towards the human body, the opposite sex, and sexuality in general.  This attitude also extends to the female nipple which is objectively essential for breast-feeding babies. Perhaps this unhealthy obsession with occasional nudity, and then endlessly discussing it and looking at photos on the internet, might reflect a lack of a healthy occupation with sex.

This blog is not a discussion about the many variations of human sexuality but just the simple inability to look at the human body as something natural and that human sexual intercourse in its many forms are a normal part of our humanity. Perhaps some fault lies with most of the world’s religions and some of their extreme American expressions (i.e. Puritanism) for such a social, emotional and intellectual mess.  Too many people were taught the strange view that things of the body are completely separate from things of the spirit, and anything enjoyable is probably ungodly and sinful.

We have for too long in the U.S. been taught and we still teach our children through our words and actions that human sexuality is somehow dirty and cannot be discussed openly in public, except by innuendo.  Thus we only encourage more confusion, exploration, and some excessive behavior because we cannot take sex out of the “prurient interest” closet.  Children need to appreciate their bodies and learn to fully respect those of other people.  They need to know the correct medical terminology for all the parts of the human anatomy and how to safely engage in sex while understanding the consequences. Then we can dump all our stupid euphemisms and warped attitudes into the garbage heap of history.

In Europe with its far more casual attitude towards human sexuality and public nudity, pregnancy among unwed teenagers and sexually transmitted diseases are just a small fraction of what they are in the U.S. We are certainly doing something wrong with respect to sex education, particularly if we want to eliminate the need for abortion and the long-term public costs of unmarried teenagers raising children. (more…)

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress